Details of DPV and References

DPV NO: 175 September 1977

Family: Reoviridae
Genus: Fijivirus
Species: Pangola stunt virus | Acronym: PaSV

Pangola stunt virus

R. G. Milne Laboratorio di Fitovirologia applicata del CNR, 10135 Torino, Italy

Contents

Introduction

First described by Dirven & van Hoof (1960) and Schank & Edwardson (1968).

A virus with polyhedral particles 65-70 nm in diameter, having a double-shelled capsid and containing double-stranded RNA. Host range confined to Gramineae and its planthopper (Delphacidae) vector. Not mechanically transmissible to plants. Causes a severe disease of pangola grass.

Main Diseases

Causes severe stunting of the tropical herbage plant pangola grass (Digitaria decumbens) and poor regeneration after cropping. Other symptoms include yellowing, kinking or twisting of young leaves and inflorescences (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), small vein swellings, excess tillering, and purpling of leaf margins. The darker green colour induced in grasses by several related viruses does not occur. The incidence of pangola stunt is highest in the dry season and in dry years, probably because these conditions favour the vector (Dirven & van Hoof, 1960; Hunkar et al., 1974).

Geographical Distribution

Guyana, Brazil, Peru, Fiji and Taiwan.

Host Range and Symptomatology

Only plants within the genus Digitaria have been investigated. It is likely that other genera within the Gramineae will prove susceptible. There is great variability in field resistance not only between different species of Digitaria but also between different lines within species (Hunkar et al., 1974). The planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) is the only reported insect host. No disease is reported in the insect. The virus is not transmissible to plants by inoculation of sap.

Diagnostic species

Highly susceptible species and varieties of Digitaria, e.g. pangola grass (D. decumbens, line PI 111110), D. longiflora 299642, D. pentzii 299769, D. setivalvola 299795, D. valida 299875 and others (see Hunkar et al., 1974). The diagnostic symptoms are those described under Main Disease. In the glasshouse, small enations detectable with a lens occur. In the field, some cells in the sheaths of the vascular bundles acquire extremely thick walls which may be diagnostic (Schank et al., 1972).

Propagation species

Probably any highly susceptible clone of Digitaria. Pangola grass itself has been used. Infected plants can be increased vegetatively.

Assay species

None tested, but the lines listed above may be used for assaying transmission by vectors. No local lesion host.

Strains

None reported.

Transmission by Vectors

The only known vector is the planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Delphacidae). Incubation in the vector is said to take 2-3 months (Dirven & van Hoof, 1960). Thin sectioning and electron microscopy show that the virus multiplies in nearly all vector tissues (Kitajima & Costa, 1970). Transmission through the egg has not been tested nor have other details of transmission been reported.

Transmission through Seed

No reports (pangola grass itself is a sterile triploid).

Transmission by Dodder

No reports.

Serology

The B-spiked inner shell of the capsid (see Particle structure) is a good immunogen but the outer shell and A spikes are very poor immunogens and there are no data about them. Antiserum prepared by injecting rabbits in the foot pads with partially purified B-spiked inner shells reacted at dilutions up to 1/256 in double diffusion tests with the same preparation but not with healthy Digitaria proteins. Gel diffusion and immune electron microscopy have shown that the B spikes and the inner shell but not the outer shell react with this antiserum. The double-stranded RNA of the virus is weakly immunogenic (Milne & Luisoni, 1977).

Relationships

Pangola stunt virus is in the reovirus group, sharing many properties with other mammalian, avian, insect and plant reo-like viruses (Reoviridae) (Fenner, 1976). The virus is distinct from wound tumor and rice dwarf viruses in capsid structure (unlike these, it has spikes on the outer shell and easily loses parts of the outer shell to give a spiked inner shell), in genome pattern (it has 9 or 10 genome segments, not 12) and in vector type (Delphacid, not Cicadellid). In these respects it is similar to maize rough dwarf and rice black streaked dwarf viruses. However, it differs from these in having a different vector within the Delphacidae, a much longer incubation period in the vector, in inducing a yellow rather than a dark green colour in infected plants and in failing to produce conspicuous enations on infected leaves. Antigenically, the spiked inner shell is similar but not identical to that of maize rough dwarf virus.

In capsid and vector it is also similar to several viruses whose genomes are undescribed: cereal tillering disease virus, oat sterile dwarf virus, arrhenatherum blue dwarf virus and lolium enation virus (Milne & Lovisolo, 1977; G. Boccardo, unpublished data).

Serologically, the inner shell and B spikes are fairly closely related to those of maize rough dwarf virus (Fig. 5, Fig. 6), rice black streaked dwarf virus and cereal tillering disease virus, but apparently unrelated to those of sugarcane Fiji disease virus, oat sterile dwarf virus, arrhenatherum blue dwarf virus and lolium enation virus (Milne & Luisoni, 1977).

Stability in Sap

Not investigated.

Purification

Only partial purification of the B-spiked inner shells has been achieved. Roots and stem bases of infected pangola grass are crushed in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7, in the cold. The extract is shaken with Freon 113 (1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2,2-trichloroethane) and the upper phase ultracentrifuged into a sucrose density gradient. The zone containing spiked inner shells (sometimes visible as a light-scattering band) is withdrawn, diluted and pelleted, to be resuspended in buffer. Alternatively, leaves are homogenised in buffer as above and the extract is shaken with chloroform, followed by two or three cycles of differential centrifugation.

Properties of Particles

Virus particles are unstable in 2% neutral phosphotungstate, 1 M NaCl, 1 M CsCl, chloroform or n-butanol, the outer shell being stripped to leave spiked or smooth inner shells. Other properties not investigated.

Particle Structure

In uranyl acetate negative stain, with or without previous glutaraldehyde fixation, the virus particle appears spherical or slightly angular, with a double shell and icosahedral symmetry. It is about 65 nm in diameter, with an apparently solid core (Fig. 10). It possesses 12 projections (A spikes) about 10 nm long and 10 nm wide. Morphological subunits are discernible in the outer shell but their number and arrangement are uncertain. The A spikes and parts of the outer shell are easily lost to give a spherical inner shell about 50 nm in diameter possessing 12 hollow B spikes 8 nm long and 12 nm wide (Fig. 11). The B spikes can be lost to give a smooth inner shell (Fig. 12). In thin sections, the virus particle appears round or angular, 65-68 nm in diameter, with a dense core about 50 nm in diameter (Fig. 4). Spiked inner shells are also seen. In negative stain and in thin sections, the particles are indistinguishable from those of maize rough dwarf and a number of similar viruses (Giannotti & Milne, 1977).

Particle Composition

Nucleic acid: The inner shell contains double-stranded RNA. The pattern of the genome bears a close similarity to that of maize rough dwarf virus. However, the only isolate investigated, cultured without transmission by the vector for several years, has 9 linear segments rather than the 10 expected: the segment corresponding to No. 8 of maize rough dwarf virus is absent or very faint after electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 9). In phosphate-Tris-EDTA buffer in 5% gels, and taking the maize rough dwarf virus genome as standard (Reddy et al., 1975), the genome segments of pangola stunt virus have the following estimated M. Wt (the figure in parenthesis refers to the faint zone corresponding to segment No. 8 of maize rough dwarf virus): 2.92, 2.54, 2.50, 2.50, 2.12, 1.75, 1.48, (1.25), 1.18, 1.12 (all x 106 daltons) (G. Boccardo, unpublished data).

Protein: No information.

Relations with Cells and Tissues

Numerous virus particles occur in the cytoplasm of phloem parenchyma and young sieve tubes, individually or in crystalline array (Schank & Edwardson, 1968; Kitajima & Costa, 1970; Schank et al., 1972; Giannotti & Milne, 1977). ‘Viroplasms’ up to 10 µm in diameter occur in infected cells (Fig. 7). These consist of filamentous matrices in which are embedded empty and full inner shells (Fig. 3). Virus particles may lie in single rows inside straight tubes 100-120 nm in diameter (Fig. 8, Fig. 4). The tubes may take an open or scroll-like form. Mitochondria, chloroplasts and nuclei are not primarily affected by the virus. In field plants, some of the bundle sheath cells become extremely thick-walled.

The virus multiplies in most insect tissues. The cytopathology, including the appearance of virus particles, viroplasms and tubes, is similar to that in plants (Kitajima & Costa, 1970).

Notes

Pangola stunt virus may be identified using immune electron microscopy on crude sap from roots or stem bases of suspect plants, or using gel double diffusion methods on concentrated sap extracts, with antisera against pangola stunt virus, maize rough dwarf virus or rice black streaked dwarf virus (Milne & Luisoni, 1977). Serological detection of the double-stranded RNA should also be possible (Ikegami & Francki, 1973).

The best means of controlling pangola stunt appears to be to find or develop resistant or tolerant lines of Digitaria. Boyd et al. (1973) report one such promising line from South Africa, D. decumbens ‘Transvaal digitgrass’, PI 299601.

Figures

References list for DPV: Pangola stunt virus (175)

  1. Boyd, Schank, Smith, Hodges, West, Kretschmer, Brolmann & Moore, Circ. Fla Univ. agric. Exp. Stn No. S-222, 16 pp., 1973.
  2. Dirven & van Hoof, Tijdschr. PlZiekt. 66: 344, 1960.
  3. Fenner, Intervirology 7: 1, 1976.
  4. Giannotti & Milne, Virology 80: 347, 1977.
  5. Hunkar, Hung, Dulder, Schank, Holder & Edwards, Tropical Agriculture 52: 75, 1974.
  6. Ikegami & Francki, Virology 56: 404, 1973.
  7. Kitajima & Costa, In 7th International Congress of Electron Microscopy, Vol. 3, p. 323, Ed. P. Favard, 1970.
  8. Milne & Lovisolo, Adv. Virus Res. 21: 267, 1977.
  9. Milne & Luisoni, Virology 80: 12, 1977.
  10. Reddy, Boccardo, Outridge, Teakle & Black, Virology 63: 287, 1975.
  11. Schank & Edwardson, Crop Sci. 8:118, 1968.
  12. Schank, Edwardson, Christie & Overman, Euphytica 21: 344, 1972.