Details of DPV and References
DPV NO: 380 October 2001
Species: Chrysanthemum stunt viroid | Acronym: CSVd
Chrysanthemum stunt viroid
R. A. Mumford Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK
- Main Diseases
- Geographical Distribution
- Host Range and Symptomatology
- Transmission by Vectors
- Transmission through Seed
- Transmission by Grafting
- Transmission by Dodder
- Nucleic Acid Hybridization
- Stability in Sap
- Properties of Particles
- Particle Structure
- Particle Composition
- Properties of Infective Nucleic Acid
- Molecular Structure
- Genome Properties
- Relations with Cells and Tissues
- Ecology and Control
Chrysanthemum stunt was first identified in the USA in 1945 (Dimond, 1947) and the causal agent was subsequently identified as a viroid in 1973 (Hollings & Stone, 1973; Diener & Lawson, 1973).
- Chrysanthemum stunt virus (Brierley, 1953)
- American stunt virus (Hollings, 1960)
A viroid consisting of a single-stranded, circular RNA molecule, of 354-356 nucleotides. Transmitted mechanically and by vegetative propagation. Found in florists' chrysanthemum (Dendranthema x grandiflorum Kitam) crops worldwide.
Causal agent of the disease 'chrysanthemum stunt' (Hollings & Stone, 1973; Diener & Lawson, 1973). Symptoms can be variable and are highly dependent on both cultivar and environmental conditions, especially temperature and light (Handley & Horst, 1988). The main symptom is stunting, with a reduction of between 30 and 50% in overall height of mature plants (Hollings, 1960) (Fig. 1 & Fig. 3). The other common symptoms are floral, with infected plants having reduced flower size (Fig. 2) and demonstrating premature flowering (Fig. 3), which can be up to ten days early (Hollings & Stone, 1973). In certain varieties, especially red, pink or bronze-pigmented ones, symptoms can also include 'bleaching' (a reduction in colour intensity) (Hollings, 1960) (Fig. 2 & Fig. 3). Foliar symptoms are less common and often are only seen as smaller, pale leaves (Brierley & Smith, 1949). Leaf spots or flecks are also sometimes observed (Hollings & Stone, 1973). The most extreme example of this is the symptom described as `measles', which appears as large, yellow leaf blotches (Keller, 1951) (Fig. 4). However, this symptom is restricted to certain old varieties and is rarely seen in naturally-infected modern varieties (Horst & Nelson, 1997). In the presence of Chrysanthemum virus B (syn. Chrysanthemum virus Q), certain varieties (e.g. Blanche) can show 'crinkle' symptoms, consisting of severe leaf distortion accompanied by white streaks or flecks (Keller, 1951). In many chrysanthemum cultivars, up to 30% of infected plants are symptomless (EPPO, 1989). The rooting efficiency of CSVd-infected cuttings is also adversely affected (Hollings & Stone, 1973).
Widely distributed, with records from Europe (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Italy, UK, Norway, Sweden, Poland), North America (USA, Canada), South America (Brazil), Africa (South Africa), Asia (Japan, India, China) and Oceania (Australia, New Zealand) (CABI/EPPO, 1997; 1998). Probably found in all countries where chrysanthemums are grown.
Host Range and Symptomatology
In addition to Dendranthema x grandiflorum, natural CSVd infections have also been reported for Argyranthemum (syn. Chrysanthemum) frutescens (Menzel & Mais, 2000) and Petunia hybrida Surfinia-type (Verhoeven et al., 1998). The symptoms of CSVd in Argyranthemum frutescens are similar to those in Dendranthema, with stunting and premature flowering observed in some cultivars. Infected Petunia hybrida Surfinia are generally symptomless, although stunting is seen in some varieties (W. Menzel, University of Hannover, Germany, personal communication). An isolate from Ageratum sp. has been sequenced (unpublished; Acc. No. Z68201) but further details regarding this host are unavailable.
A wide range of other plant species from the Compositae can be infected experimentally, by sap inoculation or grafting (Brierley, 1953). However, most of these show no symptoms. Lycopersicon esculentum has also been described as an experimental host of CSVd (Kryczynski & Paduch-Cichal, 1987), although it had been reported earlier as a non-host (Hollings & Stone, 1973).
- Diagnostic species:
The most reliable diagnostic host is the chrysanthemum cultivar 'Mistletoe'. Following chip-budding, measles symptoms (Fig. 4) should appear within 6-8 weeks, provided environmental conditions are correct (Hollings & Stone, 1973; EPPO, 1989). The cultivars 'Bonnie Jean' and 'Blazing Gold' can also be used (EPPO, 1989; Brieley & Smith, 1951), the latter giving a distinct yellow vein banding symptom As a simpler but less reliable alternative, Senecio cruentus can be mechanically inoculated with extracts from infected plants and local lesions should appear within 30 days (Brierley, 1953). Bio-assay symptoms are less distinct during winter months (Hollings & Stone, 1973; Handley & Horst, 1988). Neither bio-assay is quantitative.
- Propagation species:
Both Dendranthema x grandiflorum and Senecio cruentus have been used to maintain CSVd and as purification hosts (Diener & Lawson, 1973; Hollings & Stone, 1973).
None reported. All isolates sequenced are very similar, sharing over 94% sequence identity.
Transmission by Vectors
Despite initial reports of aphid transmission (Brierley & Smith, 1949), no transmission was detected in later studies using four different aphid species (Hollings & Stone, 1973). No transmission was observed using the red spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Hollings & Stone, 1973).
Transmission through Seed
The situation regarding seed transmission is unclear. Whereas both Hollings & Stone (1973) and Brierley (1953) found no transmission through the seeds of CSVd-infected chrysanthemum plants, Monsion et al. (1973) reported an 11% transmission rate. Transmission via seed and pollen has been reported in tomato (Kryczyski et al., 1988).
Transmission by Dodder
Data are contradictory, with transmission reported by Keller (1953) but not by Hollings & Stone (1973).
Nucleotide sequence data indicate that CSVd is distinct from all other viroids, including Chrysanthemum chlorotic mottle viroid, the other viroid that naturally infects chrysanthemum (Navarro & Flores, 1997). However, CSVd does possess a high degree of sequence similarity with other members of the Genus Pospiviroid, sharing 73 and 67% sequence identity with Potato spindle tuber viroid and Citrus exocortis viroid, respectively (Gross et al., 1982).
Stability in Sap
In common with other viroids, CSVd is very stable, with chrysanthemum sap retaining infectivity in dilutions down to 10-4 and after 10 minutes at 95-98 °C, 2-3 months at 18°C and at least 5 years at about 2°C (Hollings & Stone, 1973). Dried leaf material can remain infective at 18°C for at least 8 weeks (Hollings & Stone, 1973).
A detailed viroid extraction protocol is given by Niblett et al. (1980). This method is based upon deproteinisation using phenol, followed by DNase treatment and subsequent fractionation of the extracted RNA by LiCl precipitation and CF-11 cellulose chromatography. Further purification is achieved by using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Viroid yields in the range of 1.2 - 1.7 mg/kg can be expected from CSVd-infected chrysanthemum (Niblett et al., 1980; Palukaitis & Symons, 1979).
Properties of Infective Nucleic Acid
A covalently closed, circular, single-stranded RNA, with a calculated molecular weight of 111-114 kDa. In common with other viroids, the genomic RNA contains no open reading frames and does not encode any proteins. Under native conditions, CSVd is predicted to have a rod-shaped secondary structure (Gross et al., 1982; Haseloff & Symons, 1981). All isolates sequenced contain between 354 and 356 nt. Several full-length sequences are available, including ones for isolates from chrysanthemum (NC_002015=V01107, E13156, AB006737, AB055974, AJ000046, AJ001849, AJ001850, AJ001851, AJ001852, AJ001853, D88895, M19506), petunia (U82445) and ageratum (Z68201).
Relations with Cells and Tissues
Can be detected in both the leaves and stems of infected chrysanthemum plants.
Ecology and Control
The only effective means of control is through the use of viroid-free propagation material. Meristem-tip culture and subsequent heat treatment failed to eliminate CSVd from infected cuttings (Hollings & Stone, 1970). Spread occurs readily by mechanical means, including plant-to-plant contact, handling during cultivation and contaminated cutting tools (Brierley & Smith, 1951; Keller, 1953). Good plant hygiene measures (e.g. use of disposable blades and gloves when taking cuttings, removal of dead material etc) can help to limit spread (Horst & Nelson, 1997).
Chrysanthemum plants infected with CSVd, showing severe (left) and mild (centre) stunting symptoms. The plants on the right are uninfected. (Picture courtesy of Dr Yukimasa Hirata, Plant Biocenter, The Federation of Wakayama Prefectural Agricultural Cooperative Associations, Japan).
CSVd-induced floral symptoms in the chrysanthemum variety Princess Anne Regal. The infected flower (right) is reduced in size and shows marked colour bleaching. The other flower (left) is from an uninfected plant. (Picture courtesy of Prof. Alan Brunt, UK).
CSVd symptoms in a standing chrysanthemum crop, with plants showing varying degrees of stunting. As a result the height of the crop is very uneven. In addition, some plants (in the right foreground) are showing premature flowering and colour bleaching. (Picture courtesy of Central Science Laboratory, UK).
References list for DPV: Chrysanthemum stunt viroid (380)
- Brierley, Plant Disease Reporter 37: 343, 1953.
- Brierley & Smith, Phytopathology 39: 501, 1949.
- Brierley & Smith, Plant Disease Reporter 35: 524, 1951.
- CABI/EPPO, Quarantine Pests of Europe, 2nd Edition, p.1227, Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 1997.
- CABI/EPPO, Chrysanthemum stunt viroid. Distribution Maps of Quarantine Pests for Europe No.304. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 1998.
- Diener & Lawson, Virology 51: 94, 1973.
- Dimond, New York State Flower Growers' Bulletin 26: 2, 1947.
- EPPO, EPPO Bulletin 19: 161, 1989.
- Gross, Krupp, Domdey, Raba, Jank, Lossow, Alberty, Ramm & Sänger, European Journal of Biochemistry 121: 249, 1982.
- Handley & Horst, Acta Horticulturae 234: 89, 1988.
- Haseloff & Symons, Nucleic Acids Research 9: 2741, 1981.
- Hollings, Report of the Glasshouse Crops Research Institute 1959: 104, 1960.
- Hollings & Stone, Annals of Applied Biology 65: 311, 1970.
- Hollings & Stone, Annals of Applied Biology 74: 333, 1973.
- Horst & Nelson (eds.), Compendium of Chrysanthemum Diseases, p. 28-31, St. Paul, USA: APS Press, 1997.
- Keller, Phytopathology 41: 947, 1951.
- Keller, Cornell University Agriculture Experimental Station Memoirs 324: 40, 1953.
- Kryczynski & Paduch-Cichal, Journal of Phytopathology 120: 121, 1987.
- Kryczynski, Paduch-Cichal & Skrzeczkowski, Journal of Phytopathology 121: 51, 1988.
- Menzel & Mais, Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 107: 548, 2000.
- Monsion, Bachelier & Dunez, Annales de Phytopathologie, 5: 467, 1973.
- Navarro & Flores, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 94: 11262, 1997.
- Niblett, Dickson, Horst & Romaine, Phytopathology 70: 610, 1980.
- Palukaitis & Symons, Virology 98: 238, 1979.
- Verhoeven, Arts, Owens & Roenhorst, European Journal of Plant Pathology 104: 383, 1998.